Re: [microsound] input + software = output

[alex <alea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

 hmm... easy...David Robert....

eric hill wrote:

> >>what other kind of input does the software have? randomized elements
> >>aren't exactly the zenith of articulation, so while there is a whole world
> >>of abstract input and composition tools and techniques (spatial response
> >>triggers or wires hooked up to a plant or whatever), the human is what
> >>sets up the criteria for inclusion in the output.
> >
> >true, but what about algorithms that don't depend on direct input from a
> >user but rather take a (one time) seed value and evolve and mutate
> >structures...L-Systems or fractals are some examples of this sort of algo...
>
> those are affect generators in service to the = sign, which is the last
> point at which composition can happen. heh, has anybody done any pure
> robot music using software automatons like that?
>
> eric
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org