Re: [microsound] failure

[taylor deupree <taylor@xxxxxxx>]

> very good point!
>
> the only aesthetic i have come up with that is essential to this genre is
> actual sound. the quality of the sound that is, a thick sound i believe is
> fundamental in the composition. of course thats just my humble opinion!


i feel just the opposite.. about sound quality, that is... i think a 
THIN sound is nice.. but, that's my opinion, of course, as well... i 
use very small, thin, cold sounds in my music.. i like the space that 
it gives...

but i do agree with you in that SOUND itself is the key ingredient..


taylor,

on this week:
kim cascone "cathodeFlower"
monolake "interstate"

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + +
taylor deupree/12k
taylor@xxxxxxx
http://www.12k.com

OUT NOW:
taylor deupree + richard chartier "spec." (12k1007)

OUT SOON:
taylor deupree "cycology" (12k1008) (winter.00)
taylor deupree CD (rastermusic, jan 2000)
taylor deupree untitled 12" EP (audio.nl / netherlands)
taylor deupree remixing Goem on "extensie" (goem remix CD)
taylor deupree: kim cascone "bubblewarp" remix, on "blue cubism" 
(digital narcis/japan) 
--Boundary_(ID_cd8nSikZgDIp9vcq5FrBzQ)
Content-Type: message/rfc822; Name="Re: [microsound] failure"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit