Re: [microsound] Obsolete...

[smyglyssna <smyglyssna@xxxxxxx>]

"R. Ecalcitrance" wrote:

>  (even if he is Swedish, din morsa luktar friterad getrov i fittan! ;) ),

oh, your swedish is better than my english! would you be able to
pronounce that
too? : )

> Software may come and go but what matters is your own process of realization, if
> that's
> with reaktor cool, if it's with soundhack fine (please remember your shareware
> fees, Tom needs new shoes). In the end the only thing left is the music... and it
> doesn't matter one rats ass how you made it if sounds good*..

well, i _totally_ agree. i certainly wasn´t saying that you can´t make
good music
if you´re not using the latest and most expensive software. i know that
there are
thousands and thousands of stunning  records out there that are made
with zero gear
and i´m absolutely  sure that someone could make the uber-album of doom
by using
soundhack only.

i was merely expressing that soundhack doesn´t do it for me (so i´m
afriad i won´t
contribute to those new shoes...) and that, from my personal experience,
i wouldn´t
recommend it. but other people have strongly recommended soundhack and expressed
their huge apprecitation for it, so it´s certainly up to everyone else
to make
their own minds up about it.

but, as has been said, there are millions of ways of doing music and it doesn´t
matter which one you choose as long as the music is good.

i´ll try to behave in the future! : )

/henrik