RE: [microsound] waterloo terminal

[Kenric McDowell <kenric@xxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe sampling the actual data that flows throught the building's
information infrastructure would yield more conceptually relevant data. The
visual approach seems to represent the physical architecture more than the
information architecture that facilitates the functioning of the staion.

Kenric

-----Original Message-----
From: Eloy Anzola [mailto:leaddaet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 1:47 PM
To: microsound
Subject: Re: [microsound] waterloo terminal


Kenric was heard:

>  I
> got the connection on an aesthetic, surface level but didn't see the
process
> of composition (scanning photos of the architecture as a primary source
for
> raw sound data for manipulation) really reflecting that concept.

Can you suggest a better technique ?
How would you, or anyone on the list, make sound from
architecture ?

.... please don't take my question as criticism, I'm
genuinely curious.

thanks,

Eloy
 ------
leaddaet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://home.earthlink.net/~leaddaet

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org


--Boundary_(ID_tzAuTwEymnUMuKxn9eKKCQ)
Content-Type: message/rfc822; Name="RE: [microsound] waterloo terminal"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit