[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] Re: poor mr. pita, look what you've done to him...




i think it is funny that poor pita has to 'set the record straight' - he already had set it straight when he made work that interested most of you - the magic is in the music. it isn't about refrigerators, dj's, sampling, etc. it is about what the artist is presenting to you as a work of art - and in this way the duchamp thing, which i also initially felt was totally irrelevant, kind of makes sense because as much as a urinal questions our notions of sculpture; it seems that pita's presentation of a patch (not using a cumputer for my work i have no idea what a patch actually is!) is questionable to some of you as 'music' or sound art. it is never about being the first one or claiming some kind of virgin territory for oneself. anyone with a $30 soundmaker program can make oodles of oval tracks, but so far no one has done an oval-like record that we all like and think is original. it is the nature of this kind of music to use programs and equipment designed to do one simple task that will specifically change 'sound' in one's work - but hey that is why guitar freaks used a boss pedal or a dod pedal.

I think the original chap was actually talking about christian fennesz, but you could apply it to any one of us... peter just replyed to the thread.


you know i've always been interested in maybe turning the argument the other way, say releasing music by an "unknown" or unnamed artist and only crediting the software developer/coder involved. or maybe even presenting an abstraction not even crediting the developer but crediting only the patch name! obviously we have a problem, because the patch itself takes on a personality... it becomes an entity and begins to drink coffee or frequent night clubs... it is possible the patch could become delinquent or surly and reveal its coder's details, thus destroying our original intention... of course we have viral problems here too as a patch could contain a bug that can cross species barriers and all hell would break loose

we are still in the territory of music and art when we obsess about the composer... if we were really smart we would only deal with software. i mean do we know exactly who coded Windows2000 or MacOS? (of course it was a huge number of folks, but who they are isn't common knowledge).

g.aut.