[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] |-| Re:eR [microsound] autechre/richard devine // techniques ]]
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] |-| Re:eR [microsound] autechre/richard devine // techniques ]]
- From: Guillaume Grenier <gollum@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:23:55 -0500
On 10/01/01 17:11, jonah dempcy said in living color:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "sjb" <sjb@xxxxxx>
>
>> learn music theory.
>
> heh, traditional music theory? i question how useful this is for
> experimental/electro styled music. perhaps it would be a detriment?
Actually, I think not...
> what's that, a plagal cadence? a deft resolution to the relative minor? how
> passe. ;)
Just because you know how common practice harmony works doesn't mean you
have to use/apply the same principles in the music you create. But, IMO, it
will certainly not be detrimental.
I'll go further and say that between two persons with equal amounts of
creativity, equipment, technical proficiencies, etc., the one that possess
that kind of musical knowledge *will* create better music (even if it is not
[consciously] used in the music he/she creates).
g.
--
Guillaume Grenier - gollum@xxxxxxxxxxxx
in space there is no north in space there is no south
in space there is no east in space there is no west