Re: [microsound] extensive use of" dsp and non-realtime manipulation was:Re: [microsound]: What is microsound ? [was: autechre/richard

[dave palmer <palmderski1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

on 1/12/01 4:28 PM, Greg at gregg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> 
>> or the recording "drone hill" (I cant remember the maker right now
>> for'edexsp'er can help you out) the entire CD is excerpts from recordings
>> made with contact mics under high voltage wires. (BTW I tried it and I
>> didn't get the same results).
>> 
>> or Philip jeck (real-time and hardly extensive and hardly digital (BTW
>> "vinyl coda 1,2,3" is wonderful)
>> or that schafer man (the quad needle turntable man).
>> 
>> sorry for the lack of flushed out references. . .
> 
> I agree. The end sound/result is what distinguishes a work as microsound.
> Not the methods used to gain these results. computers are not a
> pre-requisite for microsound.
> 
> I guess this actually differs from the original terms used by Sean and Kim
> at microsound.org a bit. dsp is a possible working method, but not by a long
> way, the only one.
 123678 very cool recording! it was made by the drummer from the space
heads, also a very good band from england.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>