Re: [microsound] nato free

[john@xxxxxxxxxxx]

is there any word on whether jkc +/- c74 is planning on releasing these objects?

of course, assuming that "whether" being "yes", "when" would be "soon".

>on 5/31/01 11:10 AM, ChaoShaman@xxxxxxx at ChaoShaman@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>   is this just because theyre proud or showing theyre programming thier
>> software from scratch/own ideas?
>>   why would i not want to use nato?  i am pretty new to max/msp, but i am
>> planning on getting nato for my summer off.  i've seen some interesting
>> experimental film and shows down with it.. and i think it would be very
>> useful for getting some of my ideas outta my noggin.
>>   I guess what i'm asking, is this just prejudice / strong opinion ( i know
>> all the crap nn did/started/whatever on the max list), pride of developing an
>> alternative..  or is there some good reason not to get nato.. like serious
>> flaw/bug/unusable, or a better piece of software or maxextensions.
>
>for now... nato is the only alternative that pulls together a wide array of
>components in a single external architecture. I think that nato support used
>to be stellar, but now that nn is a fast rising international art star, SW
>dev. may be taking a back seat, thus the following thread between us:
>
>>>>>>> does an object exist that will set the monitor resolution?
>>
>>>>>> oui - mais it is not going 2 be publik.
>>
>>>>> bkausz dzere = dze poz!b!l!t! ov 01 harduear zmak
>>>>> + ! != u!sh 2 b rezponz!bl.
>>>>> 
>>>>> plz azk z!kl!ng74.
>>
>>>> can you be more specific about why it doesn<B9>t work?
>>>> [sans me having to try and decipher]
>>
>>> as indikated it workx.
>>> i shall not be releasing it 4
>>> wish to negatively responsible be 4 any hardware problems
>>> which ___... the [rare] case may be.
>>> 
>>> plz azk z!kl!ng74.
>>> 
>>> just tell them that this is their chance to release data
>>> which others already haven't for thousands of years.
>>> 
>>> should appeal to them after all.
>>
>>I would at least like the option to be responsible for HW smacks. I was
>>rather surprised to see that monitor res cannot be switched.
>
>this = the 1st translation.
>
>>help me to understand [aside from the known] why I should ask C74 for
>>features that should probably be in software that I already own and operate?
>
>because you already own max and if i realeased cycling74 would
>release it as well. tzo ____.. i cannot be bothered.
>
>you bother them oke +?
>i want to play 2!!!!
>
>LETZ B!OZKULPT!!!!!!
>
>
>>do you choose to not release for fear of possible intellectual property
>>assumption
>
>"hah"
>
>
>nn
>
>
>//////
>
>nn cannot be bothered, so at this point, it seems she is asking for it...
>either way, the meme lives on...
>
>besides, it doesn't play well with MSP, which is a problem for me.
>
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>website: http://www.microsound.org

--Boundary_(ID_usYnpKcvJP95nkwg2mRw5A)
Content-Type: message/rfc822; Name="RE: [microsound] kit clayton live"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit