[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] Re: microsound Digest 2 Aug 2001 16:25:08 -0000 Issue 369
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] Re: microsound Digest 2 Aug 2001 16:25:08 -0000 Issue 369
- From: david turgeon <david.t@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2001 14:13:25 -0400
> > I've never seen NATO but from works I've seen that
> > were done in NATO you
> > could probably substitute it by GEM and there's this
> > video addition to jMax
> > that I haven't investigated yet.
> you probably != simply superior
please. there's been genius works of cinema done with just scratching a
film (here i'm thinking of norman mclaren's most abstract films). you
should agree that to a so-called "quality operator", the tool to use
should certainly not be a matter of dogma...
& i would bet there's plenty of lame nato users who have access to the
software only because they had the means to acquire it.
~ david