Re: [microsound] to all music/sound creators

[Andrei <andrei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sat, 22 Sep 2001, Vermin B. wrote:

> I agree. But first one has to be able to percieve a plastic flower as an
> object all by itselfs and not just merely as an immitation of a real flower.
> Not always an easy thing to do.
>  Marc

And what exactly is the purpose of that object "all by itself" if not seen
as an imitation of a real flower ?

Andrei


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jean paul l'asthme" <jplasthma@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [microsound] to all music/sound creators
> 
> 
> > > A plastic flower can look verry beautifull  but
> > > where's the smell?
> >
> > there are different things to appreciate about a
> > plastic flower than there is for a real flower.
> > just as there is obvious differences between
> > sampled/edited and synthesized sounds between
> > say a real cello, violin, or percussion instrument,
> > however they each have their own allure.
> > with love,
> > gregory
> >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > *************************
> > cd-r's for sale or trade*******************
> > jean paul l'asthme: 'unstuck your eyeglue'*
> > ********************************&**********