Re: [microsound] Re: microsound Digest 4 Feb 2002 10:31:04 -0000 Issue 480

[Graeme Scott <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

>global response differs.  this can be analyzed scientifically (or nearly
>so) using the tools of semiology & sociology (or even chaos, but you'll


you know that psychologists were just fed up with the whole "get your kid to
listen to Mozart and it will be smarter" because A) it was only one study,
and B) because the stimulus (Mozart) received more attention than the idea
that complex environments help develop minds that can understand complex
environments.  I think anyone in this field of research would find that
studying the difference between two groups where one listens to Phil Thomson
and the other to Kim Cascone will not prove fruitful (how about a control
group that only has access to the microsound list?).  I guess if it can
happen, I'd like to see a hypothesis.

frankly, I thought you had misspelt seismology, in which case my reply would
have been

"base in the back of my car is soothing
2 eighteens is what i'm using."

graeme
www.vanityrecords.com

PS to phil thomson,

what is with Emma et al on your website?  it's just emma and graeme man.




-----Original Message-----
From: david turgeon <david.t@xxxxxxxx>
To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>