[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] Re: microsound Digest 4 Feb 2002 10:31:04 -0000 Issue 480
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] Re: microsound Digest 4 Feb 2002 10:31:04 -0000 Issue 480
- From: ben nevile <bbn@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2002 14:51:13 -0800
> but in science, one can prove that something is false.
since all of mathematics is built on a set of axioms, it seems to me
logically unassailable that even "proofs" of falsehood are only as good as
the axioms they rest upon. as far as I know there is no self-contained
logical system that operates without such a set of basic assumptions, and
therefore this same external dependence. but I haven't studied philosophy,
only analysis, so maybe I haven't been exposed to the necessary fruity
perspective to believe in some sort of absolute truth. ;)
bbn