RE: [microsound] mbox

[David Fodel <DFodel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> > since there´s no cheaper laptops with 7200rpm hd how PT will work?
> giving me
> > "increase hardware buffer" each time I open a plugin with a digi001 with
> a
> > athlon 1.2 with just ONE hd?
> 
> 
I use a Mac, but avoid similar issues with hard drive access by creating a
large persistent RAM disk and loading all samples etc. onto it. This of
course is dependent on available RAM, and the intended use (ie. obviously 8
discrete recorded channels of a  24/96  jam session will eat up your RAM
disk pretty quickly)

> ----------
> From: 	Bill Jarboe
> Reply To: 	microsound
> Sent: 	Monday, February 18, 2002 11:14 AM
> To: 	microsound
> Subject: 	Re: [microsound] mbox
> 
> on 2/18/02 9:34 AM, Igor Medeiros at igormpc@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > give me opinions.
> > 
> > I have a PC.
> > planning to buy a laptop later.
> > 
> > since there´s no cheaper laptops with 7200rpm hd how PT will work?
> giving me
> > "increase hardware buffer" each time I open a plugin with a digi001 with
> a
> > athlon 1.2 with just ONE hd?
> > 
> > or I have to go iBook?
> > 
> > softsynths on pro tools: just with directconnect? is it only for mac?
> > 
> > if reaktor is going rtas, it will be for pc also?
> > 
> > i think that autotune went rtas only for mac.
> > 
> > 
> > just thinking...
> > 
> > 
> > 
>   I don't know much about pc's. With a macintosh it is possible to run
> soft
> synths in pro tools with 'VST shell'; it does require alot of ram.
> 
>   I know that the Antares autotune won't run on all of the pro tools
> configurations.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
> 
>