[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] about samples



I have to agree - the postmodernist thought  has
totally destroyed the idea of originality - we all know that it's enough to
draw a moustache on
Mona Lisa, to call her your own.
But hten, if the notion that we're now entering
a new (call it post-digital, post-post-modern, whatever) phase - should we
rethink the remix
aesthetics once again ?


----- Original Message -----
From: "scissors for sparrow" <transmit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2002 2:10 PM
Subject: Re: [microsound] about samples


>
> >for the musician on the list: do you try to use only "self-made"
> >sounds or do you steal them? and what do you steal?
>
> have you heard of plunderphonics?
>
> it's also interesting to think of this argument in marxian terms -- how
> 'ownership' can be attached to an independent object, and how far removed
> one can be from one's own sound; conversely, how individuals can claim
> cultural artifacts as their own shared pool of resources.
>
> i used to be dogmatically opposed to taking sound from any source not
> (originally) created by myself with my own hands.  then it became clear
> that there are no such clear boundaries as to 'mine' or 'yours', and it
was
> more important how you approached an intended outcome anyway.
>
>
> enough natter from me.
>
>
>                                          -------------s->s.
>
>
> http://home.pacific.net.au/~transmit
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>