[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] Re: microsound Digest 8 Nov 2002 04:35:09 -0000 Issue 694
I was innitially trying to clarify the matter with a highly subjective
example. I was never trying to say there is such a thing as good or bad
but lots of different ways to decide it...notice I said "accepted at the
time as good"...
soren
* rockchimp wrote (Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:43:05AM -0800):
> thank god we have good and bad sound now.
>
> > I'm saying what makes something good is the way it's used. If we have
> > an easy to use tool, but nobody ever uses it to make something good,
> > doesn't that mean it's really a bad tool? Stradivarius designed his
> > violins for music that had already been written and was already accepted
> > at the time as good. Because there was already a definition of what is
> > good, he knew how to design the instrument.
> --
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>
------------------------------