[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
software usability
howdy....
i won't reproduce it in all its detail here, but there is a fascinating
dicsussion about the usability, flexibility and accessibility of
music softeware going on over at the [PD] list right now. the basic idea
is to go over the pros and cons of making a visual programming
environment like PD [here i paraphrase various positions] "more user
friendly", "more of a 'product'", "more accessible to Mac users/
non-programers/ non-linux people/ etc", "prettier" or simply "functional".
my favorite story so far has been from Marc Lavallée, who ended up
quitting his job at a university over the fact that his students and
administration wanted expensive, but "easier" tools like Max/MSP/Jitter
over free tools like PD/GEM. another point which seems to come up a lot
[mostly from Linux folks] is how many Win/Mac users stay "willfully"
ignorant of the workings of their own machines, preferring push-button
solutions to learning even what directory applications get installed to.
of course, there are other sides to that story as well...
good, heady stuff, if the theory of interaction with your technology is
interesting to you, which goes far beyond "platform wars" [hey! OSX and
WinNT users can compile code too!] check the archives for the thread "PD
usability":
http://iem.kug.ac.at/mailinglists/pd-list/2003-February/index.html
and read the "opening salvo" here:
http://iem.kug.ac.at/mailinglists/pd-list/2003-February/002162.html
more here:
http://iem.kug.ac.at/mailinglists/pd-list/2003-February/002203.html
cheerio!
d.
------------------------------