[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] software usability
>i won't reproduce it in all its detail here, but there is a fascinating
> dicsussion about the usability, flexibility and accessibility of
>music softeware going on over at the [PD] list right now. the basic idea
>is to go over the pros and cons of making a visual programming
>environment like PD [here i paraphrase various positions] "more user
>friendly", "more of a 'product'", "more accessible to Mac users/
>non-programers/ non-linux people/ etc", "prettier" or simply "functional".=
>
>my favorite story so far has been from Marc Lavall=E9e, who ended up
>quitting his job at a university over the fact that his students and
>administration wanted expensive, but "easier" tools like Max/MSP/Jitter
Not all painters need to make their own paints, and I don't know of any pho=
tographers who make their own cameras (aside from simple pinhole cameras). =
Some people just want to create art and don't want or need to be involved i=
n the creation of the tools that are needed to create that art.
This argument is similar to when people who write html without the use of a=
WYSIWYG program like Dreamweaver or GoLive (does anybody do that anymore?)=
think that their methods are superior to people who do use easy-to-use sof=
tware. Yet, these people would never think of writing the raw postscript co=
de that is contained in a document that Quark Xpress or Adobe Illustrator c=
reates.
If you're going to say that it's better to use PD than Max/MSP, then isn't =
it better to write your _own_ PD, and then isn't it even better for you to =
write your own operating system to run your own version of PD? And if that'=
s still not good enough, will you have to start designing your own ICs? At =
what point does it become "acceptable" to use pre-existing tools?
It seems like there should be (and is) room for both types in the world: th=
ose who prefer to create their own tools, and those who prefer to use pre-e=
xisting tools which are probably a bit easier to use.
Also, the idea of quitting's one job because the people you work with don't=
share the same concept of how one should interact with one's tools seems c=
ondescending, short-sighted, and just plain childish.
Jonathan
------------------------------