Re: [microsound] shades of grey

[neil@xxxxxxxxxxxx]

yes its all in what you do with the tool not the tool it self...
I mean does everyone who use abelton live sound like monolake?
does everyone who use msp sound like david zicerellies music or kit
clyton?
does everyone who use a moog sounds like jhon moog??
no!!!!!!!!!!!!!

neil...

On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, graham wrote:

> here we go again...
>
> why would anyone think that interfaces and technology would have any bearing or
> influence whatsoever on musical aesthetics, creative direction, or originality  -
> what a totally utterly completely absurd idea! jimi hendrix would still be jimi
> hendrix even he played kazoo right? right? i mean it's just a shell right?
> anyone? anyone? bueller?
>
> neil@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > acctually I happen to compeatly disagree with you if you know how to use
> > the patch all the patch becomes is a shell through which to make music
> > like any other max patch....
> >
> > On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, A J wrote:
> >
> > > yeah ... it's like shawn's camel toe patch...it runs itself basically (quite
> > > nicely, if i may add).  just because i chose my own samples, doesn't mean
> > > the composition is solely mine. it's more mr. hatfields' creation than my
> > > own.  that's how i feel about this issue.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >From: Shawn Hatfield <twerk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Reply-To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >Subject: Re: [microsound] shades of grey
> > > >