[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] toplap_manifesto



I'm not sure who wrote this but it's exciting to see someone thinking about
art seriously enough ..


Thus I have a question for the absentee (and thus obscurantist and
dangerous) writer:

How does "showing the screen" contra "obscurantism" and why is
"obscurantism" dangerous?


Kim -- isn't this opposite to what you wrote when you considered that
spectacle of the stage (costumes etc of rock/pop) should be countered by
reducing / redirecting the performance to the acousmatic?

Under this manifesto, such a move would be considered obscurantist and thus
dangerous.

best,

    tobias

> apologies if this has already been posted to the list:
> http://toplap.org/?ManifestoDraft
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
> 



tobias c. van Veen -----------++++
http://www.quadrantcrossing.org --
http://www.thisistheonlyart.com --
McGill Communication + Philosophy
--- New School Philosophy --------
ICQ: 18766209 | AIM: thesaibot +++ 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org