Re: [microsound] disco

[Peter Price <pprice@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

while listening to merzbow....

and most disco was not really electronic.

I was not trying to say that anything was at fault and I'm not quite 
sure why to examine things from  different scales is "silly."

I have to apologize for my initial post as I seem to have not spoken 
correctly.

People must really have a dim view of disco in this group...


On Wednesday, November 24, 2004, at 11:53 PM, Anthony Saunders wrote:

> On Nov 24, 2004, at 11:38 AM, Peter Price wrote:
> > My thought is simply that given the infinite possibilities for the 
> > organization of frequency over time, much of the music discussed here 
> > is indistinguishable  from disco.
> >
> > To refute this statement might prompt some interesting thinking...or 
> > maybe not.
>
>
> if when measured by some criteria, sogar, tetsu inoue, and merzbow are 
> all judged to be indistinguishable from disco, then it is the 
> criteria, not the microsound list, that is at fault.
>
> electronic music existed before disco, so it's really silly to even 
> make that kind of claim.
>
> anthony
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org