Re: [microsound] Biofeedback artists?

[Craque <craque@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Why should the amount of technology involved define the relative 
'artisticness' of a work? Some art is nothing BUT technology - 
especially music these days. Plenty of art relies heavy on technology; 
of course this also depends on what you define as 'technology.'

On Feb 25, 2005, at 4:54 AM, Richard John Brill wrote:

> Hello List,
>
> I'm writing a thesis on biofeedback sound installation and the science 
> and technology behind it. What are your views on the subject, i.e., do 
> you think that installations based on biofeedback technology can be 
> called artistic if they rely too much on the technology?, such as 
> Electroencephalograms, galvanic skin respone, and other general 
> biofeedback technology.
> Thanks,
>
> Rbrill
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org