Re: [microsound] maths science and electronic music

["W.C Schrimshaw" <W.C.Schrimshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

i would say that sounds very reasonable. have to check that one out some
time.
cheers.

> In his "Semiology of Music," Nattiez proposes a semiology of music as
> the investigation of the "total musical fact."
>
> He spells out a 3 part structure:
>
> 1) The "poietic process" or questions around the intention of the
> producer
>
> 2) The "trace" or the musical object in its material form (score, cd,
> mp3, air pressure)
>
> 3) The "esthetic process" or questions around the reception of the
> object by a listener.
>
> any of these by itself could constitute an interesting "heuristic
> discourse," but remains only part of the picture.
>
> In other words it is pointless to argue if "meaning" is "constructed"
> at the point of production or reception...the answer is of course both
> and everywhere in between...
>
>
> does this seem reasonable?
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>


http://www.altho.org
arts community


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org