Re: [microsound] being 'political' in non-verbal music

[Damian Stewart <damian@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Bill Ashline wrote:
> I am insisting that outside of an interpretive framework, sound has no

Can we even speak meaningfully of sound 'outside of an interpretive 
framework'?

Doesn't this just mean sound that is heard by no-one and/or recorded in 
no way? (Or recorded and not listened to.)

Can we say anything useful about or via this concept?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org