Re: [microsound] qsound?

[Graham Miller <grahammiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

i read that many albums were mixed using this process in the early  
90s, including michael jackson's dangerous (which, despite the  
content, has a some fairly amazing fidelity). it struck me as odd  
that such a mainstream project would make such an interesting attempt  
at using new kinds of technologically induced psychoacoustic effects.  
has anyone used this on more experimental work? or has this process  
been replaced with more sophisticated algorithms and processes?

thanks!

g.


On 3-Aug-06, at 2:39 AM, Jan L. wrote:

> They once had plugins for protools which I used for a short time.  
> If you can accept a bit of phaseyness, reduced mono compatibility  
> and that the listener has to sit exactly between the speakers it  
> kind of works to a degree.
>
>
>
>
> 3 aug 2006 kl. 04.34 skrev Graham Miller:
>
> > anyone know anything about this company or this process? i'm  
> > interested.
> >
> > http://www.qsound.com/2002/
> >
> > g.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org