[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] Take Rafael Toral elsewhere?



Music should speak for itself. 
Diatribes, commentary, liner notes, reviews, are obsolete.

I enjoy the new Toral, it's not groundbreaking however. I just find his work listenable, intriguing, and it matches my couch.
P!

Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:42:52 +0200
To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: steinbr=?ISO-8859-1?B?/A==?=chel <steinbruchel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [microsound] Take Rafael Toral elsewhere?
Message-ID: <C14181DC.343C%steinbruchel@xxxxxxxxxxx>

very well said. exactly my thoughts as well.
thank you for this, ralph.

ps: by the way i even think i would like the album better
if he wouldn't have said or written anything to it, but just
would have left it as his next step or next release...

Am 28.9.2006 12:38 Uhr schrieb "David Geraghty" unter
<dbgeraghty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> it almost sounds to me like he was forcing himself to
> avoid the guitar for no other reason that he thought
> it was passe now. parts sound like a poor imitation of
> oren ambarchi and i can't really see where three years
> of work went in making this.
>=20
> his previous records have been far superior and i
> can't help but thinking he's trying to convince us
> this is something new and amazing because he needs to
> convince himself.
>=20
> -d
> --- steinbr=FCchel <steinbruchel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>=20
>> hi peter
>> here's the accompayning press blah from the
>> staubgold website and in the
>> booklet of the release it's slightly more detailed.
>> when i read the text and
>> then listen to the music i just don't think he was
>> or is successful in what
>> his aims are. the album is nice and has some
>> interesting sounds, but it's
>> not at all a new approach to anything. i even think
>> it's less interesting
>> and complex then his previous work.

 		
---------------------------------
How low will we go? Check out Yahoo! Messenger?s low  PC-to-Phone call rates.