[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] cloak of invisibility
- To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [microsound] cloak of invisibility
- From: Sylvain <artheist@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:35:03 +0100
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=y88ZzyP19crr2SY9X/su6LCO+4V9eUCsWclINH1Zo2I=; b=VUQPzrb81DsG/7l/YENBYZ+R+l4TMLT8nDia9jV3j/dPe+hWAw2kXDhVHJF/ew3bRLTBtT9Hb38sQydvvJXfDOIpeWjBUw1oNlCpeze0h/pQGLG82iaS/HMNo9Yf9pKzkxhpo6cezbzDiG+KIwRDt71dxlX7yv5LnH7qdUURjZg=
Kim Cascone a écrit :
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/01/080123-sound-cloak.html
how would .microsounders use this in a sound installation?
Hi Kim,
Funny, as I just read this news this week and talked about it with a
friend of mine, who is involved in room acoustics and he told me that
this phenomenon is known for a couple of years now, and is only possible
to be "built" ("emptied" would better fit here) in a specific room
configuration, with pure tone only ...
But I really like the idea, which I hope is promising.
Cheers
Sylvain
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org