Re: [microsound] Re: commentary on one-copy label

[Michael Palace <palace@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

What about a program that creates a unique one-off for a person?  It 
provides the best or the worst of both concepts.  Mass production of music, 
yet a personal unique copy for the individual.  The art is in the program 
and not the specific music piece.

The program that I was working on that I mentioned in the physics/universe 
creation end discussion follows this concept.  I am sorry, I have had no 
time and made no progress on getting the program up and running again.  I 
feel I might have killed that music discussion thread due to my inactivity 
on program progress.

Mike Palace

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "ieva" <ieva@xxxxxxx>
To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [microsound] Re: commentary on one-copy label


> i've bagan music from free softawre hached by friend of mine in computer 
> university, no money,  it's just a way with that kind of sound to be more 
> near from my perception and sensation,, and i think from the beginninig, 
> that  kind of tool is open to everybody to say what they, feel,, live, and 
> it's open to every body feeling,
> so one copy one copy is jerk off for people seems to believe that 
> definition of artist is ego , and it s that open it to everyboby, 
> everybody has something to say about their individuality,
> one copy is shit as money is shit,
> only love and partage for everybody, copy and copy
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Glenn Folkvord" <glenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sunday, March 30, 2008 9:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [microsound] Re: commentary on one-copy label
>
>
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "steinbr ü chel" <steinbruchel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > > not necessarily, but does this matter? is music art? when is something 
> > > art?
> > > when not?
> >
> > This kind of argument only throws the discussion in the gutter and serves 
> > no purpose :-)
> >
> > > it'll just be a shame to have so much (probably) good music made for
> > > (almost) no one to hear.
> >
> > Nobody has a "right" to hear any music.
> >
> > While I too hate to not have access to good music, someone who decide to 
> > release their music in only one copy because they have a good motivation 
> > behind it, just like painters and sculptureres do most of the time, makes 
> > a statement *and* a release (albeit limited) at the same time, and they 
> > are just as valid for doing so as those who reproduce their work in 
> > thousands or hundreds.
> >
> > The idea that music *should* be replicated and *should* be available for 
> > more than one or few persons is, in principle, nothing to pursue.
> >
> > Greetings from Glenn Folkvord
> > Web & content editor, Planet Origo
> >
> > Origo Sound music: http://www.cdbaby.com/all/origosound
> > Origo Sound info: http://www.myspace.com/origosound
> > Origo Sound news: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/origosound
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org