MUTEK abuse...

[c s <w111cms@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

ok,

you guys took a message i originally posted to talk about the artists and 
music and turned it into a platform war.  the original comment was meant 
simply to relay the prevalence of mac's at mutek.  as both a mac and pc user 
myself there was no ill-will meant towards either platform.

why don't we bring the discussion back to the original topic and discuss 
mutek.  i was rather enjoying reading the postings that contained mutek in 
the subject header when they actually had something to do with mutek.

ok. here's the required musical portion of this message:

why is it that when you go to see 'larger' artists that you somehow leave 
more disappointed than when you go to see relatively 'small' artists.  i 
know this is slightly an off topic musing, however after being more 
impressed at mutek by the artists who i would (out of cognitive necessity) 
label as 'small' or 'less popular' (delay, clayton, chartier) as opposed to 
those i would label as being 'large' (brinkmann, pole).  i realize that it's 
possibly only a i had higher expectations for the 'larger' artists but could 
it also be that the 'larger' artists shape their live performances so that 
they would be more appealing to a mass audience?  pole, brinkmann both 
seemed in my opinion to curve their music to be even more dance-y than their 
recorded material is.  opinions?

craig.



craig. s.
w111cms@xxxxxxxxxxx



.. . . . . . . . . . . .
..    aural architecture
..                     minimal techno/tech house/ambient/idm
..     hosted by craig s
..                     thursdays 11pm-2am/106.9 fm/dayton ohio
..        {cochlear art}
..                     aural_architecture@xxxxxxxxxxx
.. . . . . . . . . . . .



________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com