[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [microsound] microvising
interesting... it does seem to be catching on in a big way - or, perhaps
that's not the way to describe it - but there's a lot more "microvised"
(great word) stuff coming out lately, even with a little "aboveground"
resonance (such as the fennesz/ambarchi/pimmon/rehberg/rowe on ritornell).
didn't jon pareles or someone do a piece on this stuff not so long ago in
the NYTimes?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 6:25 PM
> To: microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [microsound] microvising
>
>
> while I was performing in Stuttgart this past summer with
> Pita and Hecker
> we had a discussion with the curator of the Kunstlerhaus about laptop
> microsound being the "new jazz"...I was wondering if there were any
> opinions on this list about the concept of "microvising"?...
> KIM
>
>
> __________________________
> kim.cascone
> sound.designer...composer
>
> microsound hotline server: microsound.dyn.dhs.org
>
> kim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.anechoicmedia.com
>
> "the smooth always posseses a greater power of deterritorialization
> than the striated."
> - Deleuze & Guattari
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>