Re: [microsound] the moeps project (was "live n' shit")

[jonah dempcy <jdempcy@xxxxxxxx>]

very nice!

unfortunately the moment of execution also requires a certain proficiency
which this model fails to account for, and there is this ever-elusive
quality that permeates the moment of execution yet is somehow removed from
it. one might say that the gestalt of all factors environmental, musical,
conscious & subconscious reach a unison of yearning that the musician meets
with beautiful harmony and trance inducing rhythm, the collective
audience/band symbiosis reaching a state of pure energy where everyone is
channelling their entire perception and consciousness into the virtuosity of
the musicians and the ecstatic music being created.

so we would have to judge shows based on that too.

-jonah

----- Original Message -----
From: "jason urick" <themoonstealingproject@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [microsound] the moeps project (was "live n' shit")


> so maybe we should start graphing out live show
> reviews as to how "live" they are. we could
> standardize it...so all magazines and publications
> would have to use this system. this would of course do
> away with unwanteds such as editorial bias.
>
> example: live review:::ruins w/high rise
>
> ruins were first. they were extremely live with 8,902
> moments of execution. a VERY LIVE show!