Re: [microsound] specifics and over reading. . .

[Jeremy Tolsma <ccws@xxxxxxxx>]

.. .
>
>but I see very little need to play be-bop on your computer. . . and
> don't see why you would want too. . .

I don't see why anyone would want to play 'microsound' if 'microsound' means
you have to play a certain way with certain instruments.

>nor do I see anything wrong with
> playing a guitar with a laptop (in fact I'm an a band with me on
> "electronics" (a laptop (running max (with quite a lot of 'moments of
> influence' (or whatever you judge live by)) and a a synthesizer) and a
> bassist and drummer. . . and everyone gets along fine. . . going from
> 'microsound' to kroutrock (and that's probably spelled wrong to). . .
>     I do not know why people read so much into these things. . . and (for
> the most part) get the wrong meaning as to what I said. . .
>

Probably because you're saying exactly the opposite now as you did
yesterday.

> I know this has nothing to do with any of the threads currently, but I
felt
> like people had been kicked in the gut by things I was not trying to say
in
> what I wrote. . .

Although you weren't the one who flamed me, I'm getting a little tired of
people flaming the shit out of me and then apologizing afterwards.  Whats
the point?  How did this trend get started anyway?  Its like people want to
throw their weight around but not step on anyones toes.  Well, can't have it
both ways..