Re: [microsound] nato free

[M Stevens <m@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sure, it looks like great software, but the whole "here's fifty messages 
a day of cryptic ascii because my mamma didn't hold me enough as a baby" 
thing is a bit of a deterrent. And I'm guessing tech support responses 
are something along the lines of a few quotes from sycophantic emails nn 
has gotten, interspersed with a core dump from something-or-other, and 
an attachment that boogers your OS.

On Thursday, May 31, 2001, at 11:10 AM, ChaoShaman@xxxxxxx wrote:

> their computers are nato
> > free territorial.
> > - stephan
>
>     is this just because theyre proud or showing theyre programming 
> thier
> software from scratch/own ideas?
>     why would i not want to use nato?  i am pretty new to max/msp, but 
> i am
> planning on getting nato for my summer off.  i've seen some interesting
> experimental film and shows down with it.. and i think it would be very
> useful for getting some of my ideas outta my noggin.
>     I guess what i'm asking, is this just prejudice / strong opinion 
> ( i know
> all the crap nn did/started/whatever on the max list), pride of 
> developing an
> alternative..  or is there some good reason not to get nato.. like 
> serious
> flaw/bug/unusable, or a better piece of software or maxextensions.
>
>
> joe e
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
--Boundary_(ID_usYnpKcvJP95nkwg2mRw5A)
Content-Type: message/rfc822; Name="Re: [microsound] nato free"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit