re: [microsound] nato free

[stephan mathieu <sssst@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> their computers are nato
> >free territorial.
> > - stephan

> I guess what i'm asking, is this just prejudice / strong opinion ( i know 
> all the crap nn did/started/whatever on the max list), pride of 
developing 
> an 
> alternative..  or is there some good reason not to get nato.. like 
serious 
> flaw/bug/unusable, or a better piece of software or maxextensions.

not at all, i just wanted to say that kit clayton doesnt use nato.
 - st
--Boundary_(ID_usYnpKcvJP95nkwg2mRw5A)
Content-Type: message/rfc822; Name="re: [microsound] nato free"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit