Re: [microsound] labels

[Þ_01 <p_01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

dealing with mego:response 1:public relations ...
....................

pita @ mego _ extremely busy european


........................................
ok.

a few things
if you indeed did send a cd its probably sitting in the pile with all the
other stuff.

we get about 5 demo cds a day. thats about 5 hours of music most of which
probably is not very good. why should i have to listen to something that is
not very good???
most of the stuff that gets sent contains some blurb stating that:


1. this would be really good for your label
2. is microsound, glitch, experimental, minimal or whatever crap term is hip
now.
3. has a design with lower case graphics and makes use of the 'lets see how
much space we cannot use' school of graphic design.

none of the above interests me in the slightest.


add to this our own release schedule (about 15 releases in production over
the next 6 months) to take care of and the daily arrival of releases for our
mdos catalogue its fair to say that demo cds and tapes do not have a very
high priority round here.

plus the fact i am often weeks at a time not in the office.

i noticed you sent that microsound list waffle. why??? i do not need all
that shit twice!!
the only good thing on that list are the posts by jeremy tolsma who i
believe is being filtered out by the other list members. oh dear.

i am not sure what all the fuss is about anyway. we do listen to demos. how
else would we have released stuff by fennesz, farmersmanual, hecker, tujiko
noriko, uli troyer, nachtstrom and so on

to be brutaly honest:

WE ARE NOT LOOKING FOR ANYTHING AT THE MOMENT AND EVEN IF WE WERE WE ARE
ABLE TO FIND IT OURSELVES THANK YOU VERY MUCH.


bst
p