Re: [microsound] McDonna files

["luke (c)" <luke@xxxxxxxxx>]

actually, I'dd say the loops were particularly *screwed* for anyone
wishing to do a *tame* remix. this was kinda my point. I was hoping  to
od a tame dancy littlew number.. but NO. 

I imagine pepople can do some very wicked things with some KY and a
crucifix, without really knowing anythign inside out... well at least at
first.


excuse that last comment I've had too much to drink.

Luke


mark wrote:
> 
> I suspect that they are expecting fairly tame remixes - Acid is
> really of the tracker school of music making (although I am sure someone
> who knows the tool inside out could do wicked things with it - not
> sure who would bother learning it that well though).
> 
> mark
> 
> _______________________________________________
> junklight - dark experimental electronics
> http://www/junklight.com
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: luke (c) [mailto:luke@xxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 22 January 2002 12:19
> > To: microsound
> > Subject: Re: [microsound] McDonna files
> >
> >
> > well I downloaded most of the files form the acid site and i'd have to
> > say that even for a  *remix* project they SUCK.
> > heavily effected vocals and some *megamix* loops from the whole song.
> >
> > what a waste of bandwidth...
> >
> > Luke (c)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The pHarmanaut wrote:
> > >
> > > I figure the rules are pretty much the standard "sample and
> > manipulate", but
> > > with sources from the Madonna site rather than the
> > Parasites disc. Anything
> > > more than that involved? Is there a McDonna drop box on hotline yet?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > The idea of the project is an alternative microsound take on this
> > > > competition: ::: http://www.remixmadonna.com :::
> > > > Kim I believe will be posting rules and regulations in
> > due course this
> > > being
> > > > as it where a sequel to the parasites project.
> > > >
> > > > cheers
> > > >
> > > > mark
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > junklight - dark experimental electronics
> > > > http://www/junklight.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: stephan mathieu [mailto:sssst@xxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > > Sent: 21 January 2002 06:54
> > > > > To: microsound
> > > > > Subject: re: [microsound] McDonna files
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > I havn't been following this thread, but from what I
> > > > > understand, it sounds
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > website: http://www.microsound.org
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > website: http://www.microsound.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > website: http://www.microsound.org
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org