Re: [microsound] the soothing sounds of max/msp

[The pHarmanaut <pharmanaut@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

You're leaving out the crucial role of the vaseline, David. I'm very
disappointed. And I thought Kim was more of an oregano man.

Cheers,
-=Trace

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Fodel" <DFodel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'microsound'" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: [microsound] the soothing sounds of max/msp


> oh i disagree entirely.
>
> i always put my red cables in the freezer overnight prior to a studio
> session....
>
> and i think Kim is always trying to say clever things so he appears to be
> some kind of sage.
>
> :)
>
> David Fodel
> Publishing Systems Manager
> Wild Oats Markets
> 3375 Mitchell Lane
> Boulder, CO 80301
> Direct: 720-562-4831
> Fax: 303-938-8474
>
>
> > ----------
> > From: Eloy Anzola
> > Reply To: microsound
> > Sent: Friday, February 1, 2002 1:19 PM
> > To: microsound
> > Subject: RE: [microsound] the soothing sounds of max/msp
> >
> > >Being able to discern which software was used
> > >in a piece tells me absolutely nothing about the music.
> >
> > The tool is the message.
> >
> > "the medium is no longer the message; rather, specific tools
> > themselves have become the message."
> >                             Kim Cascone
> >
> > I also suggest cooking the red cables beforehand, so they
> > become red hot. They'll sound much much faster.
> >
> > Eloy
> >  ------
> > eloy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://groovylab.com/
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
> > Behalf Of manys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:09 PM
> > To: microsound
> > Subject: RE: [microsound] the soothing sounds of max/msp
> >
> >
> > >I highly recommend the use of red cables, not only
> > >with MAX but with any audio application.
> >
> > Does anybody else notice how these threads' devolving into jokes pretty
> > much guarantees that this thread will crop up again and again
unresolved?
> > Like a soap opera, people seem to be addicted to this kind of nerdy
drama,
> > posed as if the differences between two different software sound
> > generators (or software vs. hardware, or electronic vs. acoustic, ad
> > nauseam) are more distinguishable and significant than the different
ways
> > that musicians themselves make music. It is interesting as a
> > musician/composer to note the differences here, but are these
distinctions
> > at all useful to a listener? Being able to discern which software was
used
> > in a piece tells me absolutely nothing about the music.
> >
> > Someone once said that a poor craftsman blames his tools; what does that
> > say about people who keep the statistics on who is blaming what?
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > website: http://www.microsound.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
>