RE: [microsound] liberalism/power/control

[christian toepfner <c@xxxxxxxx>]

     hi,

     other references of choice could be:
     - hardt, negri: empire
     - jameson: the cultural turn. selected writings on postmodernism
       (especialy: postmodernism and consumer society)
     - butler, laclau, zizek: contingency, hegemony, universality. con-
       temporary dialogues on the left
     - laclau, mouffe: hegemony and socialist strategy. towards a radical
       democratic politics
     - zizek: the ticklish subject. the absent centre of political
       ontology

     they take on most of the already proposed names like gramsci, lacan,
     foucault, &c.
     for more (art)historical views, the situationists (especially the
     scandinavian section) could be of some interest...


     best, c



     On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Philip Sherburne wrote:

>    I think that Gramsci might be an appropriate reference here, but I'm
>    not 100% sure. Grad school days are fuzzy..
>
>>   -----Original Message-----
>>   From: rob [mailto:rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>   Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:30 PM
>>   To: microsound; microsound
>>   Subject: Re: [microsound] liberalism/power/control
>>
>>
>>   Foucault, Discilpine and Punish
>>   Really any of the post-structuralists, um Bell Hooks, Black Looks.
>>   For the anarchists try TAZ by Hakim Bey.  For the psychology angle
>>   try lacan.  If you think Freud might have had something, but got lost
>>   along the way.  lacan could be for you.
>>   Rob
>>
>>   ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
>>   From: Andrei <andrei@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>   Reply-To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>