Re: [microsound] Deleuze/ disinformation/ disses

["b/." <barney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

tattermalion wrote:

> i'm not addressing the way people think. i don't assume to know in what manner thoughts are generated by anyone. i'm not even sure that everyone has the ability to think. 
> i'm merely questioning the importance and reverence granted to post-structuralist model building on this list. one's level of exposure to post-pop philosophy is not in any way discernable in one's music. sorry. staying up late reading microsound or the computer music tutorial by curtis roads will impact one's music a helluva lot more than the collected works of Deleuze & Gutarri (sp.?).
if you _aren't_ adressing the way people think, on what authority do you 
say that .microsound or curtis roads are more likely to inform an 
artist's work than philosophical texts, or any other piece of art for 
that matter?
surely it depends on the approach of the individual.

try comparing the essay i posted previously, and this month's wire 
interview with taylor deupree/richard chartier. you may find the 
experience illuminating- or then again you may not, but here your 
argument seems to be as exclusive as your perception of that which you 
are arguing against.

b/.