Re: [microsound] off topic is on

[BJM <bent@xxxxxxxxx>]

hear hear...

b

Jorge Blank wrote:

>I just wanted to express that I thought the person who
>felt the need to critisize the person who posted the
>kikoman advertisment was a little out of line.
>
>The digest for this list is already totally long.  A
>little humor or other commentary occasionally really
>makes little or no differance.  I personally enjoyed
>that animation quite a bit and though it isn't
>"microsound" it certainly is interesting and thought
>provoking, and relates to "our medium" in many ways
>actually.  Is all of the cultural theory book
>reviewing that goes on here microsound specifically? 
>the answer is no.  Therefore I request that anyone who
>feels the need to lecture anyone elses editorial
>sensabilities edit thier own.  Lets let Kim moderate. 
>If you have a problem, talk to him.  No need to
>humiliate people simply sharing thier observations,
>espiecially not in front of everyone else reading
>this.
>
>to define microsound (or an email list, which is even
>more ridiculous)overspecifically would be at cross
>purpose with intellectual, aesthetic, and musical
>development, as well as contrary to the spirit of
>invention.  
>
>Please continue to enlighten me with tasty leaves and
>petals from your individual memedoms.  Otherwise I
>shall cease to read your email list, for I certainly
>don't so much read it for all of the masturbatory self
>exaltations and privaledged points of view.
>
>
>love
>
>J.
>
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
>http://webhosting.yahoo.com
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>website: http://www.microsound.org
>
>
>
>  
>

------------------------------