Re: [microsound] Sound installations

[Kenric McDowell <kenricm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I prefer to think of the documentation as a subjective interpretation 
of the work. It is a new work in a different media than the 
installation (unless you are creating an installation to document 
another installation... ???!!!) so different techniques should be used 
to present an interpretation of the work. For video documentation I 
would take advantage of commonly understood cinematic temporal and 
spatial cues (cuts, pans, dissolves, fly-throughs, etc.) to create an 
impression of the time and space of the work.

-km

On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 10:10 AM, duncan speakman wrote:
>
> Is it worth trying to document sound installations? In most of my work 
> the
> 3D acoustic space where its presented is key and IMHO yer average 
> stereo
>
>

------------------------------