Re: [microsound] project invite: 'City of the Future'

[spw <stevepwats@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I downloaded a bit of the AIFF posted and I have to say it kind of sucks.
Not much to work with if you make something that is at least tolerable to
listen to.
It reminded a bad sound effects record, I also checked out some of the
projects on the=20
Microsound web site and what a waste of time, no practical purpose.

on 4/3/03 5:30 PM, =95_______________ =95 at l---------------------l@xxxxxxxx
wrote:

> Patrick Norris wrote:
>=20
> =BF
> .
>=20
>> I was wondering exactly the same thing, as synthesizing new sound is mor=
e of
>> my bag, I wondered what exactly we were allowed to put in.
>> P
>=20
> '       .
> =BF
>=20
> i do not wish to began a debate; however, i am inclined to prefer using
> the source material solely.  i confess to having begun this way today;
> however, my reasons for choosing this decision are largely because i
> feel the strength of past projekts [not to mention my admiration for the =
final
> compositions] are the members use of this familiar material.  i would be
> quite suprised to find i stand alone on this issue.
>=20
>=20
> =BF
>=20
> so, i personally will use the source material but will none-the-less
> enjoy what others contribute based on their decision.  naturally, i hope
> many will choose likwise.
>=20
>=20
> '=20
> =BF
>=20
> after reading kim's post more carefully, i suspekt this projekt was
> meant to be more open to one's personal interpretation and respekt this
> agenda.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> .
> =BF                               =BF
>=20
> '
>=20
> 1001
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org

------------------------------