Re: [microsound] shades of grey

[graham <grahammiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

here we go again...

why would anyone think that interfaces and technology would have any bearing or
influence whatsoever on musical aesthetics, creative direction, or originality  -
what a totally utterly completely absurd idea! jimi hendrix would still be jimi
hendrix even he played kazoo right? right? i mean it's just a shell right?
anyone? anyone? bueller?

neil@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> acctually I happen to compeatly disagree with you if you know how to use
> the patch all the patch becomes is a shell through which to make music
> like any other max patch....
>
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, A J wrote:
>
> > yeah ... it's like shawn's camel toe patch...it runs itself basically (quite
> > nicely, if i may add).  just because i chose my own samples, doesn't mean
> > the composition is solely mine. it's more mr. hatfields' creation than my
> > own.  that's how i feel about this issue.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >From: Shawn Hatfield <twerk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Reply-To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >Subject: Re: [microsound] shades of grey
> > >