Re: [microsound] projects

["tobias c. van Veen" <tobias@xxxxxxxxx>]

It's not very obvious at all. I mean at the level of the concept. Somebody
diesnged that architecture, created that sine wave. Aren't you sampling
that? If you've read Curtis Roads, or anyone else on electronic sound, then
you know that processes themselves are concepts. Ie contents. And sampling a
process is sampling. Sampling doesn't necessarily refer to a finished piece
of work: as Trace implies, field recording is a form of sampling too. You're
just sampling nature. tV

>> What constitutes non-sampled content today?
> 
> Isnt that very obvious? If you sample it, it is sampled.
> 
> There have been analog samplers around - from the Mellotron to maybe the
> pitch-changing/time-stretching tape machines the germans made under
> WW-II.
> 
> While I personally love using analog sound electronics those who create
> with digital samples can continue doing so - just ask for a permission.
> I dont see the significance of that requirement. Just do it. And even
> without permission, for "artsy" type installations/concerts there is
> never any trouble - there is no point in suing someone that doesnt have
> any money.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
> 



tobias c. van Veen -----------++++
http://www.quadrantcrossing.org --
http://www.thisistheonlyart.com --
McGill Communication + Philosophy
--- New School Philosophy --------
ICQ: 18766209 | AIM: thesaibot +++ 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org