[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[microsound] Re: usefulness of compressors/mastering in experimentalmusic
- To: microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [microsound] Re: usefulness of compressors/mastering in experimentalmusic
- From: Ben Swire <btswire@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:34:01 -0800 (PST)
- Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
> Compression and limiting are, alongside
> equalization,
> the most useful techniques in mastering, as well as
> the most frequently abused. In addition to sucking
> life out of the dynamic range, heavy compression and
> limiting introduce distortion. For some reason, in
> almost every genre, the trend has become to make
> releases as loud as possible at the expense of audio
> fidelity. I am a fan of the Waves C4 multiband
> compressor and the L1+ limiter (which also has
> dithering algorithms) in moderation. I generally
compress
> material
> no more than 3-4 db in the compression stage, paying
> close attention not to squash any band of
> frequencies.
> I then follow the compressor with the L1. The L1
> also offers makeup gain compensation. This means
> that
> when audio hits or exceeds the threshold point, this
> becomes the loudest signal possible without digital
> clipping. I set the output stage to -3/10 db just
> to
> be safe. I also avoid more than 3 db of limiting,
> as
> any more than this (which is very common) will
> almost
> always be detrimental to the quality of the
> recording.
-Ben
www.foundrysite.com/benswire
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org