Hi David,
best, derek
I was simply pointing out that the promotion of an event or new music can provoke discussion regarding the technique, aesthetic or theory there involved....
I am wondering if the split is really useful.
I think the split is less about the difference in content of the two lists and more about the perceived need of its recipients. I am thinking that maybe some of the people here are quite self-contained.... working within their own sphere and not feeling the need to look outside of that.... others want to here about what is going on in the world of microsound.
So how many people on the discussion list are NOT going to sign up for the promotion list?... if that is a significanbt proportion ... then maybe the split makes sense. But for me - I will always be interested in both sides.... i like to hear what stasisfield are doing.... i like to hear about techniques and historical perspectives on theory.
----- Original Message ----- From: "derek holzer" <derek@xxxxxxx>
To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 11:59 AM
Subject: Re: [microsound] closed captioned
would all of you jokers please go back to slashdot or whatever blog you crawled out of and leave the rest of us alone.
d.
rafael flores wrote:
it is necessary to create a list to discuss whichever lists is necessary to create .
From: graham miller <grahammiller@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: microsound <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [microsound] closed captioned Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 14:01:50 -0500
> > > what happens if you want to discuss a promotion? > > or promote a discussion?
:)
i say we create two more lists for said topics.
-- derek holzer ::: http://www.umatic.nl ---Oblique Strategy # 168: "Use fewer notes"
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx website: http://www.microsound.org