Re: [microsound] process and preset [was: Re: [microsound] ovalprocess - Average laptop geek?]

[andrew benson <cloudmachine99@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes,
It seems a matter of choosing which battle you need to
fight.  I tend to take a less binary approach, as I am
someone concerned with both process and product. 
Although I agree that there are people who define
their work as one or the other, I don't think we all
fit so perfectly in either camp.
andrew
--- Frank Barknecht <fbar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hallo,
> andrew benson hat gesagt: // andrew benson wrote:
> 
> > Why reinvent the wheel every time you need to make
> something.
> 
> What I intended to express with my first mail in
> this thread is, that
> some artists (the "Processors") are interested in
> exploring and
> expressing how a process works, what processes there
> are etc. 
> 
> So to answer the wheel question: If you deal not
> with wheels, but with
> the process of how the wheel was invented, it can be
> fruitful to
> (re)invent the wheel, yes. Of course if you want to
> get from A to B,
> there's nothing wrong with using an existing wheel.
> 
> Ciao
> -- 
>  Frank Barknecht                               _
> ______footils.org__
>              
>           _ __latest track: "scans" _
> http://footils.org/cms/show/41
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org
> 
> 

Andrew Benson
www.cloudmachines.net

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org