[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [microsound] podcasting site?




Apple added som extra tags that allow you look good in iTunes. These are optional, they simply give you the opportunity to look as good as their own feeds to the iTunes-user.


They did this the right way by placing these custom tags in their own namespace. If you dont want to add them then dont. If you want to declare the Apple-namespace but with a fuckApple: prefix instead of itunes: then XML allows you to. It is all up to you.

RSS is described here: http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss

Apple extensions here: http://phobos.apple.com/static/iTunesRSS.html




20 jul 2005 kl. 19.31 skrev nathan c. dickerson:

Look at the format of a podcast RSS feed and you will find the following tags:

<itunes:explicit></itunes:explicit>
<itunes:author></itunes:author>
<itunes:summary></itunes:summary>

This technology existed before itunes. There is no reason to name tags
this way in any kind of open standard.

Apple created a stylized version of a product that already existed;
Understood the trend of content syndication, exploited it, and
produced a defacto standard, which they now control.

Even the RSS community has a problem with this -- Apple didn't even
consult the RSS community about format standards.

Upon hearing 'podcast', 'ipod' immediatly comes to mind. This is wrong
for any kind of open standard -- this is associative trademark
branding!

This is Apples game -- Apple's habits of branding in public spaces
(renting/buying ALL the advertising space in transportation hubs such
as subways and public transit systems) and virtual spaces is
unethical.

Are there really only a few people here who see a problem with this?

On 7/20/05, Guillaume Grenier <grenier.g@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 20/07/05 10:08, { brad brace } said in living color:


wouldn't simple downloads of mp3s(or oggs) be more
egalitarian than becoming dependent on proprietary ipod
hard/software?


There's nothing proprietary in podcasts.

It's just a RSS 2.0 feed (using an XML file) with a MP3 enclosure.

As for aggregators (the software that checks and downloads new content),
there are a shitload of them: some free/some not free (in the $ sense), some
developed by companies/developed by a community/developed by just one guy,
some open-source/some closed, etc. Just choose whatever works best for you.


Actually, the only proprietary aspect of the whole thing is the MP3. And of
course, you're not obligated to use this format -- you could use an Ogg file
or whatever else audio format you see fit to use.


You can then listen to these "podcasts" on whichever device you want.

g.

--
Guillaume Grenier - grenier.g@xxxxxxxxxxxx

"Things are more like they are now than they ever were before."

(Dwight Eisenhower)



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org





--
contact: nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
pattern media - http://patternmedia.com/
pattern records - http://patternrecords.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org