[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [microsound] robert henke
you might find colin potter's work to be of interest
where he works with beat related projects ( of less interest for me )
his drone or "ambient" work is very concise, and solid on the level
with thomas k, imho.
it is common the occurrence when a "techno" beat oriented programmer
makes "ambient" music, while some of robert h. work is intriguing, it
doesn't hit the mark in depth, in repeated listens, it sounds as if
something is missing.
On Oct 10, 2005, at 12:20 PM, steinbrüchel wrote:
i agree mostly, but think the work of thomas köner is on another level
then
the soundscape work of robert. köners sound is far more radical and
worked
out, that's why i prefer it.
out of this reason i more enjoy the beat structured stuff by monolake,
that's where he's very good at me thinks.
Am 10.10.2005 18:05 Uhr schrieb "P. Lasell" unter <p_lasell@xxxxxxxxx>:
Been spending some time listening to Robert Henke's ambient lps
'Signal to
Noise' and 'Floating Point'. Great work imo. While I love his work
with
Monolake, I think I like his beatless soundscapes better. Anyone have
any
opinions on the matter? I also am heavily into Thomas Koner's work. I
can
rarely settle my mind into working like that.
Peter
www.peterlasell.net
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
--
http://www.synchron.ch .:.::.:.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org