Re: [microsound] i know this has been said before but....

[roberth <roberth@xxxxxxxxxx>]

ah
whether its acoustic free improv
or electronic music using " the same process, tools, methodology and  
> sometimes even source material "
usually does mean it is the same sound
most folks doing the above end up with mediocre shit.
its the exceptions that happen that i am interested in
when someone breaks through and even though they started with
the same stuff, they break through into something jem like.

that said right now i am real sick on the sound
of the line 6 delay unit used live.

robert horton

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mr.D" <craque@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "microsound" <microsound@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 1:58 PM
Subject: Re: [microsound] i know this has been said before but....


> amen.
>
> my guess is that there is a mythological aspect of this; some deep  
> misconception that having the same process, tools, methodology and  
> sometimes even source material will create likewise the same sound.
>
> On Jan 27, 2006, at 10:20 AM, aleks vasic wrote:
>
> > Why do many people focus soley on the process with which any type  
> > of electronic music is made?  The methodology?  What about the  
> > final result?  How many guitars are sold that function in basically  
> > the same way?  How  many traditional instrument period?  Its what  
> > you do with them, what you create that should garner ones attention.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> website: http://www.microsound.org

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org