Re: [microsound] audio-to-midi converters

[Rod Stasick <rod@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 2006 Aug 18, at 9:50 AM, ãããããããã wrote:
> In general you can say that the results get worse as the material
> gets more complex. Additionally the ability to deal with polyphonic
> input is, as far as I know still experimental. For instance if you
> have some simple flute music or one person singing "aaahhh" solo
> you would likely get something fairly clean and usable. The problem
> is most of what's interesting is far more complex and potentially
> is chock full of not quite right sounding material. From what I
> understand the problem lies in not only accuracy but what to
> ignore. The beginnings of sounds often contain unpitched material
> that can mistrack. On the other hand waiting until it's over leaves
> you with a lag and likelyhood that the rhythmic timing will wind up
> sloppy.

Thanks Nick. Much of the stuff that I'm looking at
is earlier work on DAT that is polyphonic and has
some microtone considerations. Wanting to get a
reasonable representation into score form.

Rod






---
Now playing: Segun Adewale - Atewo-Lara Ka Tepa Mo'se
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: microsound-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: microsound-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
website: http://www.microsound.org